clown with a lawyer briefcase

Corporations Don’t Have the Right to Make Fools of Themselves Through Self-Representation

  He who represents himself has a fool for a client. — Abraham Lincoln This is one of the most famous legal quotes of all time. But did you know that a corporation cannot represent itself without counsel? An individual can represent himself in court. Unlike an individual, however, a corporation can only be represented…

Read More »

The Productive Lawyer 01: Clear to Neutral

  Lately, I’ve been noodling about how to become more productive. My law practice has become quite busy (with an honorable mention to my personal life). Unfortunately, this blog has been one of the casualties. Last year, blog posts were consistently published on a weekly basis. This year I have only published two posts to…

Read More »

In re I-Coat: Internet Evidence in Ex Parte Proceedings

Less than two weeks ago, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) issued its precedential decision in In re I-Coat Company, LLC. The case involved I-Coat’s appeal from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (“USPTO”) refusal to register its three trademark applications for INDIGO for corrective lenses based on a likelihood of confusion with Schwabe…

Read More »

Do Federal Courts Have Jurisdiction Over Pending Trademark Applications? Sometimes …

It seems axiomatic that a federal district court has jurisdiction to decide whether a pending federal trademark application can be registered or not. Yet, the truth is a federal district court only has power over pending federal trademark applications under certain circumstances.

Read More »

How I Used a Consent Agreement To Win a Trademark Infringement Lawsuit

In my last blog post, I discussed how the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) has been dealing with trademark consent agreements. This post views consent agreements from a different perspective, a litigant’s perspective. It’s important to differentiate between these two different contexts. Remember, a trademark consent agreement is just a private contract. And while…

Read More »

The USPTO Is Dropping the Hammer on Consent Agreements Since In re Bay State Brewing

A consent agreement is exactly what it sounds like. It’s an agreement in which a party consents to the use and registration of the other party’s trademark. Usually, the agreement is bilateral with both parties consenting to the other’s use and registration. Consent agreements are usually submitted to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”)…

Read More »